No single-company control
No single employer may hold a majority on the Technical Steering Committee. Maintainer and TSC seats are earned by individuals through contribution and merit, not granted to companies.
The TOSSI Foundation - the Telecom Open Source System Integrator - is a neutral, vendor-independent home for the work of integrating the open telecom stack into a coherent, validated, production-grade whole. This page is the charter overview: who we are, what we govern, how we make decisions, and how intellectual property flows through the foundation.
We model our governance on the proven open-source playbook for neutral, community-run projects: transparent decision-making in the open, a Technical Steering Committee that owns the technical direction, a clear project lifecycle, and an explicit, permissive IP policy. We did not invent this model - we adopted the practices that have repeatedly proven to work in large, neutral communities.
TOSSI exists to make the open telecom stack deployable as a whole. Excellent open-source projects already exist for every layer - 5G Core, RAN, RIC, SMO, applications, security, cloud-native infrastructure. What is missing is the neutral connective tissue: the conformance harnesses, integration blueprints, interoperability test suites, and reference deployments that let components from different projects and vendors work together in production.
Our mission: to integrate, validate, and steward the open telecom stack - from 5G Core and O-RAN through RIC, SMO, applications, post-quantum security, and the cloud-native substrate - as a coherent, tested, production-grade system, under neutral and transparent governance.
We are a system integrator, not an implementer. We rarely ship a new core, RAN, or controller of our own. Our deliverables are the glue, the tests, and the trust.
TOSSI’s technical scope spans the full open telecom stack. We organize it as a set of pillars, each governed as one or more projects under the TSC.
To stay neutral and focused, TOSSI deliberately does not:
Neutrality is the product. A system integrator is only trustworthy if no single vendor can capture it. TOSSI enforces neutrality structurally, not just rhetorically.
No single-company control
No single employer may hold a majority on the Technical Steering Committee. Maintainer and TSC seats are earned by individuals through contribution and merit, not granted to companies.
Open by default
Decisions, meetings, agendas, and minutes happen in public. Mailing lists, issue trackers, and meeting recordings are open to all. “If it isn’t written down in the open, it didn’t happen.”
Vendor-agnostic validation
Conformance suites test against published standards, never against a preferred implementation. Any compliant component must be able to pass.
Permissive IP
Apache-2.0 code and CC-BY-4.0 docs mean no one - including a future TOSSI - can lock the community out of its own work.
TOSSI follows the two-track structure common to mature, neutral open-source foundations: a business/stewardship track (the Governing Board) and a technical track (the Technical Steering Committee), kept deliberately separate so that funding never buys technical control.
Governing Board
Stewards the foundation’s resources, budget, marketing, legal, trademark, and membership. It does not make technical decisions. Composed of member representatives plus a non-voting TSC liaison.
Technical Steering Committee (TSC)
Owns all technical direction: project lifecycle, cross-project architecture, conformance policy, and release coordination. Members are elected by and from the active maintainer community. See Technical Steering Committee.
Projects & SIGs
Each pillar maps to one or more projects, run day-to-day by their maintainers, and to Special Interest Groups / working groups open to all contributors. See Community.
Code of Conduct Committee
A small, independent committee that receives and adjudicates conduct reports confidentially. See Code of Conduct.
TOSSI decisions are made in the open, and almost always by lazy consensus.
Propose in the open. Any contributor may raise a proposal as a GitHub issue, a pull request, or - for cross-project changes - a lightweight TOSSI Enhancement Proposal (TEP).
Discuss. The proposal is discussed on the issue/PR and, when relevant, in the appropriate SIG or community call. Minutes are public.
Lazy consensus. If no one with standing objects within the review window (typically 3–5 business days for routine changes, longer for architectural ones), the proposal is approved. Silence is assent.
Escalate only when needed. If consensus cannot be reached, the question escalates: maintainers resolve project-local disputes; the TSC resolves cross-project disputes.
Vote as a last resort. When the TSC must vote, decisions pass by simple majority of voting members, with quorum at two-thirds. Votes and rationale are recorded publicly.
We prefer consensus over voting, the open record over private decisions, and the smallest body that can decide over escalation. Voting is a backstop, not the default.
TOSSI’s IP policy is permissive by design, following a standard inbound-equals-outbound contribution model.
Code - Apache License 2.0
All TOSSI-originated code - integration tooling, conformance harnesses, blueprints, operators, and SDKs - is licensed under Apache-2.0. Apache-2.0 includes an explicit patent grant, which matters in a standards-heavy domain like telecom.
Documentation - CC-BY-4.0
All documentation and written content, including this site, is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. You may reuse, adapt, and redistribute it with attribution.
git commit -s), certifying you have the right to submit the work. See Contributing.This charter is a living document. Changes follow the same open process as any other decision: proposed in the open, discussed, and ratified by the TSC (with Governing Board concurrence for changes affecting IP, trademark, or membership). The current revision and its history live in the public repository.